SN74CBT3253(C)PWR vs. FST3253MTCX

Post Reply
S58J
 

Posts: 10
Joined: 31 Dec 2021, 13:08

SN74CBT3253(C)PWR vs. FST3253MTCX

Post by S58J »

Hi

Today I got the plain (tr)uSDX PCBs. Looks I'll be soldering all night... hi.

I have a questions, though. Beside the listed SN74CBT3253PWR I also have the SN74CBT3253(C)PWR (brackes arround letter C are intentional to indicate the different marking) as well as I have the FST3253MTCX. Are the last two anything better than the SN74CBT3253PWR or simply makes no difference whichever I choose? The idea is to build and programme the mainboard and wait for the schematics for the higher bands RF board version.

Kind regards

Janez, ON/S58J
Faraaz VK4JJ
 

Posts: 215
Joined: 30 Dec 2021, 21:56

Re: SN74CBT3253(C)PWR vs. FST3253MTCX

Post by Faraaz VK4JJ »

S58J wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 20:49 Hi

Today I got the plain (tr)uSDX PCBs. Looks I'll be soldering all night... hi.

I have a questions, though. Beside the listed SN74CBT3253PWR I also have the SN74CBT3253(C)PWR (brackes arround letter C are intentional to indicate the different marking) as well as I have the FST3253MTCX. Are the last two anything better than the SN74CBT3253PWR or simply makes no difference whichever I choose? The idea is to build and programme the mainboard and wait for the schematics for the higher bands RF board version.

Kind regards

Janez, ON/S58J
Have a look through the datasheets, compare and let us know ;)
S58J
 

Posts: 10
Joined: 31 Dec 2021, 13:08

Re: SN74CBT3253(C)PWR vs. FST3253MTCX

Post by S58J »

Hi Faraaz

I wish I had enough technical knowledge .... hence my question.

But it originates from mcHF project where 74CBT3253C was used both as mixer and in the BPF and there was an agreement that it is better to replace it with FST3253. There was also an issue with "non C" 74CBT3253 which did not work as a switch in the BPF. Again, I am not familiar with the technicalities.

Regards

Janez, ON/S58J
wa2t
 

Posts: 180
Joined: 01 Jan 2022, 16:30

Re: SN74CBT3253(C)PWR vs. FST3253MTCX

Post by wa2t »

S58J wrote: 05 Jan 2022, 21:35 Hi Faraaz

I wish I had enough technical knowledge .... hence my question.

But it originates from mcHF project where 74CBT3253C was used both as mixer and in the BPF and there was an agreement that it is better to replace it with FST3253. There was also an issue with "non C" 74CBT3253 which did not work as a switch in the BPF. Again, I am not familiar with the technicalities.

Regards

Janez, ON/S58J
viewtopic.php?p=627#p627
Post Reply

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest